WASHINGTON — The Justice Division has requested the Home committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault for transcripts of interviews it’s conducting behind closed doorways, together with some with associates of former President Donald J. Trump, in keeping with folks with data of the state of affairs.

The transfer is additional proof of the wide-ranging nature of the division’s felony inquiry into the occasions main as much as the assault on the Capitol and the function performed by Mr. Trump and his allies as they sought to maintain him in workplace after his defeat within the 2020 election.

The Home committee, which has no energy to pursue felony costs, has interviewed greater than 1,000 folks up to now, and the transcripts might be utilized by the Justice Division as proof in potential felony instances, to pursue new leads or as a baseline for brand spanking new interviews performed by federal regulation enforcement officers.

Aides to Consultant Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi and the chairman of the committee, have but to succeed in a remaining settlement with the Justice Division on what will likely be turned over, in keeping with an individual with data of the matter who spoke on the situation of anonymity due to the confidential nature of the investigations.

On April 20, Kenneth A. Well mannered Jr., the assistant legal professional basic for the felony division, and Matthew M. Graves, the U.S. legal professional for the District of Columbia, wrote to Timothy J. Heaphy, the lead investigator for the Home panel, advising him that some committee interviews “might comprise data related to a felony investigation we’re conducting.”

Mr. Well mannered and Mr. Graves didn’t point out the variety of transcripts they had been requesting or whether or not any interviews had been of specific curiosity. Of their letter, they made a broad request, asking that the panel “present to us transcripts of those interviews, and of any further interviews you conduct sooner or later.”

An individual acquainted with the matter mentioned the transcripts had been a part of a negotiation between the committee and the Justice Division wherein the panel hoped that prosecutors would flip over proof in alternate for the transcripts.

“The interviews within the possession of the committee are the property of the committee,” mentioned Consultant Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland and a member of the panel. “I think about that the committee will need to see any related proof used with any related authorized context.”

Requested concerning the Justice Division’s request after this text was revealed, Mr. Thompson drew a distinction between handing over the committee’s supplies and permitting sure paperwork to be reviewed. He advised that the panel had invested important effort and time into conducting so many interviews and was reluctant to easily flip them over.

“We are able to’t give them full entry to our product,” he informed reporters. “That will be untimely at this level, as a result of we haven’t accomplished our personal work.”

A spokesman for the Justice Division declined to remark.

The division’s investigation has been working on a separate monitor from the committee’s work. Typically, investigators engaged on the 2 inquiries haven’t been sharing data, apart from at occasions speaking to make sure that a witness is just not scheduled to look earlier than totally different investigators on the similar time, in keeping with an individual with data of the inquiries.

So far, the Justice Division has prosecuted greater than 800 folks on costs associated to the storming of the Capitol. However over the previous a number of months, the division has taken steps to widen its focus considerably to take a look at the planning for the rally on Jan. 6 that preceded the riot whereas additionally signaling that its investigation would embody the broader efforts to overturn the election. And in latest weeks, Lawyer Normal Merrick B. Garland has bolstered the core staff tasked with dealing with probably the most delicate and politically flamable components of the inquiry.

A number of months in the past, the division quietly detailed a veteran federal prosecutor from Maryland, Thomas Windom, to the division’s headquarters. He’s overseeing the politically fraught query of whether or not a case might be made associated to different efforts to overturn the election, apart from the storming of the Capitol. That activity may transfer the investigation nearer to Mr. Trump and his internal circle.

A subpoena reviewed by The New York Occasions signifies that the Justice Division is exploring the actions taken by rally planners.

Prosecutors have begun asking for information about individuals who organized or spoke at a number of pro-Trump rallies after the 2020 election in addition to anybody who supplied safety at these occasions, and about those that had been deemed to be “V.I.P. attendees.”

They’re additionally looking for details about any members of the chief and legislative branches who might have taken half in planning or executing the rallies, or tried to “impede, affect, impede or delay” the certification of the election, because the subpoena put it.

The Justice Division’s request for transcripts underscores how a lot floor the Home committee has coated, and the bizarre nature of a state of affairs the place a well-staffed congressional investigation has obtained testimony from key witnesses earlier than a grand jury investigation.

The committee has signaled that it’s considering making a criminal referral of Mr. Trump and a few of his associates to the Justice Division, a step that would enhance the strain on Mr. Garland to pursue a case.

In a ruling in a civil swimsuit filed by the committee, a federal judge found in March that Mr. Trump and John Eastman, a lawyer who had suggested him on how one can overturn the election, most probably had dedicated felonies, together with obstructing the work of Congress and conspiring to defraud the US.

The Home committee, made up of seven Democrats and two Republicans, is led by Mr. Thompson and Consultant Liz Cheney of Wyoming, certainly one of solely two Home Republicans to embrace an inquiry scrutinizing the actions of their very own celebration. The panel has about 45 workers, together with greater than a dozen former federal prosecutors and two former U.S. attorneys, and it’s spending greater than $1.6 million per quarter on its work.

The committee has obtained paperwork and testimony from a variety of witnesses, together with greater than a dozen Trump White Home officers, rally planners and a number of the rioters themselves.

These witnesses have included White Home attorneys; Justice Division officers; safety officers; members of the Nationwide Guard; employees members near former Vice President Mike Pence; members of Mr. Trump’s private authorized staff; Republicans who participated in a scheme to place ahead pro-Trump electors from states received by Joseph R. Biden Jr.; Mr. Trump’s family members; and the leaders of right-wing militia teams.

Not less than 16 Trump allies have signaled they won’t absolutely cooperate with the committee. Confronted with such resistance, investigators on the panel have taken a page out of organized crime prosecutions and have quietly turned a minimum of six lower-level Trump administration employees members into witnesses who’ve supplied details about their bosses’ actions.

A few of these witnesses — together with an aide to Mark Meadows, the previous White Home chief of employees — have supplied vital data.

The committee additionally has tried to acquire testimony from Republican members of Congress, and it issued subpoenas to five lawmakers final week. These members have denigrated the panel’s work however have declined to say whether or not they would take part within the interviews, that are scheduled for the tip of Could. One of many lawmakers, Consultant Jim Jordan of Ohio, mentioned he acquired his subpoena on Monday and was reviewing it.

Mr. Garland and his high aides have been cautious about not disclosing their investigative strategies, and so they have sought to emphasise their impartiality in restricted public feedback concerning the investigation.

“We examine conduct and crimes, not folks or viewpoints,” the deputy legal professional basic, Lisa O. Monaco, mentioned final week throughout an interview on the College of Chicago.

“We observe the proof,” she added. “It is rather vital to try this methodically.”